4.7 Article

Atomic and molecular absorption in redshifted radio sources

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 467, Issue 4, Pages 4514-4525

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx408

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: ISM-quasars: absorption lines; radio lines: galaxies; ultraviolet: galaxies

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. California Institute of Technology under NASA [NAS5-98034]
  3. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on a survey for associated HI 21-cm and OH 18-cm absorption with the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope at redshifts z approximate to 0.2-0.4. Although the low-redshift selection ensures that our targets are below the critical ultraviolet luminosity (L-UV similar to 10(23) W Hz(-1)), which is hypothesized to ionize all of the neutral gas in the host galaxy, we do not obtain any detection in the six sources searched. Analysing these in context of the previous surveys, in addition to the anticorrelation with the ultraviolet luminosity ( ionizing photon rate), we find a correlation between the strength of the absorption and the blue-near-infrared colour, as well as the radio-band turnover frequency. We believe that these are due to the photoionization of the neutral gas, an obscured sightline being more conducive to the presence of cold gas and the compact radio emission being better intercepted by the absorbing gas, maximizing the flux coverage, respectively. Regarding the photoionization, the compilation of the previous surveys increases the significance of the critical ionizing photon rate, above which all of the gas in the host galaxy is hypothesized to be ionized (Q(HI) approximate to 3 x 10(56) s(-1)), to > 5 sigma. This reaffirms that this is an ubiquitous effect, which has profound implications for the detection of neutral gas in these objects with the Square Kilometre Array.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available