4.6 Article

Solid-type supercapacitor of reduced graphene oxide-metal organic framework composite coated on carbon fiber paper

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 69-77

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.082

Keywords

Reduced graphene oxide; Carbon fibre paper; Metal-organic framework; HKUST-1; Supercapacitors

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  2. Commission on Higher Education [TRG5680043]
  3. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI)
  4. National Research University Project of Thailand (NRU)
  5. National Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC) under the National Science and Technology Development Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A composite material of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology-1 (HKUST-1) metal organic framework (MOF) was produced and used as the supercapacitor electrode material. Pure HKUST-1 has a microporous structure with poor conductivity limiting its electrochemical applications while loading rGO to HKUST-1 leads to a novel composite with a mesoporous structure and good electrochemical properties. 10 wt.% rGO/HKUST-1 has a high BET surface area of 1241m(2) g(-1), a specific pore volume of 0.78 cm(3) g(-1), and an average pore diameter of 8.2 nm, which is a proper pore size to allow uptaking and releasing of electrolytes. A half-cell electrode of 10 wt.% rGO/HKUST-1 coated on flexible carbon fiber paper (CFP) exhibits a high specific capacitance of 385 F g(-1) at 1 Ag-1 while pure HKUST-1 stores only 0.5 F g(-1). A 1.8(n) x 4.0(n) symmetric solid-type supercapacitor of the 10 wt.% rGO/HKUST-1 exhibits a specific power of 3100 W kg (-1) and a specific energy of 42 Wh kg(-1). The supercapacitor can practically supply electricity to a spinning 3-V motor over 9-min discharging time. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available