4.7 Article

Galaxies in the Illustris simulation as seen by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - I. Bulge plus disc decompositions, methods and biases

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 467, Issue 1, Pages 1033-1066

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx017

Keywords

hydrodynamics; catalogues; surveys; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF2-51384.001-A]
  2. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. British Columbia Knowledge and Development Fund
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  6. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  7. Participating Institutions
  8. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an image-based method for comparing the structural properties of galaxies produced in hydrodynamical simulations to real galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The key feature of our work is the introduction of extensive observational realism, such as object crowding, noise and viewing angle, to the synthetic images of simulated galaxies, so that they can be fairly compared to real galaxy catalogues. We apply our methodology to the dust-free synthetic image catalogue of galaxies from the Illustris simulation at z = 0, which are then fit with bulge+ disc models to obtain morphological parameters. In this first paper in a series, we detail our methods, quantify observational biases and present publicly available bulge+disc decomposition catalogues. We find that our bulge+ disc decompositions are largely robust to the observational biases that affect decompositions of real galaxies. However, we identify a significant population of galaxies (roughly 30 per cent of the full sample) in Illustris that are prone to internal segmentation, leading to systematically reduced flux estimates by up to a factor of 6, smaller half-light radii by up to a factor of similar to 2 and generally erroneous bulge-to-total fractions of (B/T) = 0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available