4.7 Article

The SUrvey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts - I. Survey description and overview

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 473, Issue 1, Pages 116-135

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2126

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: observational; surveys

Funding

  1. Commonwealth of Australia
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  3. Swinburne
  4. Australian Government
  5. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [617199]
  6. ERC [610058]
  7. Office of Integrative Activities
  8. Office Of The Director [1458952] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P006892/1, ST/M003035/1, ST/P002218/1, ST/P000649/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. STFC [ST/M003035/1, ST/P002218/1, ST/P000649/1, ST/P006892/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the Survey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts (SUPERB), an ongoing pulsar and fast transient survey using the Parkes radio telescope. SUPERB involves real-time acceleration searches for pulsars and single-pulse searches for pulsars and fast radio bursts. We report on the observational set-up, data analysis, multiwavelength/messenger connections, survey sensitivities to pulsars and fast radio bursts and the impact of radio frequency interference. We further report on the first 10 pulsars discovered in the project. Among these is PSR J1306-40, a millisecond pulsar in a binary system where it appears to be eclipsed for a large fraction of the orbit. PSR J1421-4407 is another binary millisecond pulsar; its orbital period is 30.7 d. This orbital period is in a range where only highly eccentric binaries are known, and expected by theory; despite this its orbit has an eccentricity of 10-5.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available