4.7 Article

Hibernating black holes revealed by photometric mass functions

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 473, Issue 4, Pages 5195-5209

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2690

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; stars: black holes; novae, cataclysmic variables; X-rays: binaries

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust [VP2-2015-046]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO) under the Severo Ochoa Program MINECO [SEV-2015-0548]
  3. Mansfield College
  4. STFC [ST/P00556X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/P00556X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a novel strategy to uncover the Galactic population of quiescent black holes (BHs). This is based on a new concept, the photometric mass function (PMF), which opens up the possibility of an efficient identification of dynamical BHs in large fields-of-view. This exploits the width of the disc H alpha emission line, combined with orbital period information. We here show that H alpha widths can be recovered using a combination of customized H alpha filters. By setting a width cut-off at 2200 km s(-1) we are able to cleanly remove other Galactic populations of H alpha emitters, including similar to 99.9 per cent of cataclysmic variables (CVs). Only short-period (P-orb < 2.1 h) eclipsing CVs and AGNs will contaminate the sample but these can be easily flagged through photometric variability and, in the latter case, also mid-IR colours. We also describe the strategy of a deep (r = 22) Galactic plane survey based on the concept of PMFs: HAWKs, the HAlpha-Width Kilo-deg Survey. We estimate that similar to 800 deg(2) are required to unveil similar to 50 new dynamical BHs, a three-fold improvement over the known population. For comparison, a century would be needed to produce an enlarged sample of 50 dynamical BHs from X-ray transients at the current discovery rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available