4.7 Article

Rayleigh scattering in dense fluid helium

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 473, Issue 1, Pages 457-469

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2440

Keywords

atomic processes; opacity; scattering

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET, Argentina) [PIP 114-201101-00208]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion Productiva (Argentina) [PICT 2016-1128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iglesias et al. showed that the Rayleigh scattering from helium atoms decreases by collective effects in the atmospheres of cool white dwarf stars. Their study is here extended to consider an accurate evaluation of the atomic polarizability and the density effects involved in the Rayleigh cross-section over a wide density-temperature region. The dynamic dipole polarizability of helium atoms in the ground state is determinated with the oscillator-strength distribution approach. The spectral density of oscillator strength considered includes most significant single and doubly excited transitions to discrete and continuum energies. Static and dynamic polarizability results are confronted with experiments and other theoretical evaluations shown a very good agreement. In addition, the refractive index of helium is evaluated with the Lorentz-Lorenz equation and shows a satisfactory agreement with the most recent experiments. The effect of spatial correlation of atoms on the Rayleigh scattering is calculated with Monte Carlo simulations and effective energy potentials that represent the particle interactions, covering fluid densities between 0.005 and a few g cm(-3) and temperatures between 1 000 and 15 000 K. We provide analytical fits from which the Rayleigh cross-section of fluid helium can be easily calculated at wavelength lambda > 505.35 angstrom. Collision-induced light scattering was estimated to be the dominant scattering process at densities greater than 1-2 g cm(-3) depending on the temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available