4.7 Article

Galaxy And Mass Assembly: search for a population of high-entropy galaxy groups

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 469, Issue 3, Pages 3489-3504

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1081

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium; galaxies: groups: general; X-rays; galaxies: clusters

Funding

  1. STFC Postgraduate Studentship
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1, ST/P000541/1]
  3. Royal Society through the award of a University Research Fellowship
  4. NSERC (Canada)
  5. Pauli Center for Theoretical Studies ETH UZH
  6. STFC Advanced Fellowship
  7. STFC (UK)
  8. ARC (Australia)
  9. AAO
  10. STFC [ST/L00075X/1, ST/J001465/1, ST/F007159/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/L00061X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1, ST/M000966/1, ST/F007159/1, ST/P000541/1, ST/J001465/1, ST/L00061X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory are used to examine the hot gas properties within a sample of 10 galaxy groups selected from the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey's optical Friends-of-Friends group catalogue. Our groups have been screened to eliminate spurious and unrelaxed systems, and the effectiveness of this procedure is demonstrated by the detection of intergalactic hot gas in 80 per cent of our sample. However, we find that 9 of the 10 are X-ray underluminous by a mean factor of similar to 4 compared to typical X-ray-selected samples. Consistent with this, the majority of our groups have gas fractions that are lower and gas entropies somewhat higher than those seen in typical X-ray-selected samples. Two groups, which have high 2 sigma lower limits on their gas entropy, are candidates for the population of high-entropy groups predicted by some active galactic nucleus feedback models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available