4.6 Article

3D Nanostructured Molybdenum Diselenide/Graphene Foam as Anodes for Long-Cycle Life Lithium-ion Batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 103-111

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.138

Keywords

Graphene; MoSe2 nanolayers; Synergistic effect; Lithium-ion battery; Long-cycle life

Funding

  1. U. S. Army Research Office through the MURI grant [W911NF-11-1-0362]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112015CDJZR305501]
  3. U. S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research for the MURI grant [FA9550-12-1-0035]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A self-assembled MoSe2 nanolayers/reduced graphene oxide (MoSe2/rGO) foam was prepared using a hydrothermal method. The samples were systematically investigated by X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Electrochemical performances were evaluated in two-electrode cells versus metallic lithium. It is demonstrated that the obtained MoSe2/rGO nanocomposites show three-dimensional architecture and excellent electrochemical performance as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. The specific capacity of MoSe2/rGO anode can reach up to 650 mAh g(-1) at a current rate of 0.1C in the voltage range 0.01-3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+), which is higher than the theoretical capacity of MoSe2 (422 mAh g(-1)). Additionally, the fabricated half cells have shown good rate capability and long cycling stability with 10.9% capacity loss after 600 cycles under a current density of 0.5C. The excellent performance of the synthesized MoSe2/rGO is attributed to its unique nanostructure, including nanolayered MoSe2, highly conductive rGO networks and mechanically stable 3D architecture. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available