4.6 Article

Electrochemical performance and stability of La0.2Sr0.8Ti0.9Ni0.1O3-δ and La0.2Sr0.8Ti0.9Ni0.1O3-δ - Gd0.2Ce0.8O2-δ anode with anode interlayer in H2 and CH4

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 39-46

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.017

Keywords

SOFC; Stability; Anode interlayer; Composite anode; Ex-solution

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0023389]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0023389] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Donor-doped SrTiO3 is a promising material for use as an alternative anode to solve stability problems due to carbon coking or Ni coarsening etc. of conventional Ni-cermet anodes. Electro-catalytic Ni nanoparticles can be produced in La and Ni co-doped SrTiO3 or La0.2Sr0.8Ti0.9Ni0.1O3-delta (LSTN) anode when it is exposed to a reducing atmosphere. In this work, we study the effects of Gd0.2Ce0.8O2-delta (GDC) either as an anode interlayer (between anode and electrolyte) or as a composite phase in an anode composed of La and Ni co-doped SrTiO3 (La0.2Sr0.8Ti0.9Ni0.1O3-delta, LSTN). The electrochemical performance (i.e., impedance spectra and power density) of electrolyte-supported cells in which scandia-stabilized zirconia (ScSZ) is used as an electrolyte and LSTN or LSTN-GDC is used as the anode, are examined and compared at 800 degrees C in H-2 and CH4 fuels. LSTN anode was stable and had improved performance in both H-2 and CH4 fuels when GDC was composited and also used as an anode interlayer. A significant reduction of anodic polarization resistance in CH4 gas is clearly demonstrated. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available