4.6 Article

Solid-solution-like ZnO/C composites as excellent anode materials for lithium ion batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages 165-173

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.133

Keywords

solid-solution-like; ZnO/C composites; electrospinning; anode materials; lithium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11274107, 61204109, 21303046, 21303047]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0185]
  3. National Excellent Doctorial Dissertation of China [201318]
  4. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation [CX2014A007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exploring advanced anode materials to maximize the capacity of lithium ion batteries has been an active research area for decades. Constructing composites materials has been proved to be one of the most effective methods to achieve higher capacity due to the synergistic effect. In this work, we proposed and demonstrated a concept of solid-solution-like ZnO/C composites to approach the largest possible synergistic effect by introducing the most interfaces and minimizing the pulverization. The solidsolution- like ZnO/C electrode could achieve a high reversible capacity of 813.3 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 100 mA g(-1) after 100 cycles with a decrease rate of only 0.4% per cycle. Moreover, the discharge capacity still maintained 53.5% of the original value even when the current density increased to 40 times as much as the original, showing a distinguished rate performance. In addition, such solid-solution-like nanofibers can be easily prepared because of their compatibility with the existing industrial PAN-based spinning process. This may pave the way to mass produce lithium ion batteries with significantly enhanced performance using existing low-cost commercial facilities and recipes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available