4.7 Article

Partial mixing and the formation of 13C pockets in AGB stars: effects on the s-process elements

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 471, Issue 1, Pages 824-838

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1502

Keywords

nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; stars: abundances; stars: AGB and post-AGB

Funding

  1. Go8-DAAD Australia/Germany Joint research cooperation scheme
  2. Sofja Kovalevskaja Award from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of the elements heavier than iron via slow neutron captures (the s process) is a main feature of the contribution of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars of low mass (< 5 M circle dot) to the chemistry of the cosmos. However, our understanding of the main neutron source, the C-13(alpha, n)O-16 reaction, is still incomplete. It is commonly assumed that in AGB stars mixing beyond convective borders drives the formation of C-13 pockets. However, there is no agreement on the nature of such mixing and free parameters are present. By means of a parametric model, we investigate the impact of different mixing functions on the final s-process abundances in low-mass AGB models. Typically, changing the shape of the mixing function or the mass extent of the region affected by the mixing produce the same results. Variations in the relative abundance distribution of the three s-process peaks (Sr, Ba, and Pb) are generally within +/-0.2 dex, similar to the observational error bars. We conclude that other stellar uncertainties-the effect of rotation and of overshoot into the C-O core-play a more important role than the details of the mixing function. The exception is at low metallicity, where the Pb abundance is significantly affected. In relation to the composition observed in stardust silicon carbide grains from AGB stars, the models are relatively close to the data only when assuming the most extreme variation in the mixing profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available