4.7 Article

Testing lowered isothermal models with direct N-body simulations of globular clusters - II. Multimass models

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 470, Issue 3, Pages 2736-2761

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1311

Keywords

methods: numerical; stars: black holes; stars: kinematics and dynamics; globular clusters: general; galaxies: star clusters: general

Funding

  1. Royal Society (University Research Fellowship)
  2. Royal Society (Newton International Fellowship)
  3. European Research Council [ERC-StG-335936]
  4. Radboud Excellence Initiative Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lowered isothermal models, such as the multimass Michie-King models, have been successful in describing observational data of globular clusters. In this study, we assess whether such models are able to describe the phase space properties of evolutionary N-body models. We compare the multimass models as implemented in LIMEPY (Gieles & Zocchi) to N-body models of star clusters with different retention fractions for the black holes and neutron stars evolving in a tidal field. We find that multimass models successfully reproduce the density and velocity dispersion profiles of the different mass components in all evolutionary phases and for different remnants retention. We further use these results to study the evolution of global model parameters. We find that over the lifetime of clusters, radial anisotropy gradually evolves from the low-to the high-mass components and we identify features in the properties of observable stars that are indicative of the presence of stellar-mass black holes. We find that the model velocity scale depends on mass as m(-delta), with delta similar or equal to 0.5 for almost all models, but the dependence of central velocity dispersion on m can be shallower, depending on the dark remnant content, and agrees well with that of the N-body models. The reported model parameters, and correlations amongst them, can be used as theoretical priors when fitting these types of mass models to observational data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available