4.6 Article

Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity of Isocoumarin Paepalantine: Morphological and Molecular Docking Analysis

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22050786

Keywords

paepalantine; isocoumarin; antibacterial; Helicobacter pylori; penicillin-binding protein; docking

Funding

  1. Espirito Santo Research Foundation (FAPES)
  2. Brazilian National Council for scientific and technological development (CNPq)
  3. FAPES
  4. National Postdoctoral Program (PNPD/Capes)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Helicobacter pylori bacterium is one of the main causes of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and even gastric cancer. It affects an average of half of the world population. Its difficult eradication depends upon multi-drug therapy. Since its classification as a group 1 carcinogenic by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the importance of H. pylori eradication has obtained a novel meaning. There is considerable interest in alternative therapies for the eradication of H. pylori using compounds from a wide range of natural products. In the present study, we investigated the antibacterial property of the isocoumarin paepalantine against H. pylori and it exhibited significant anti-H. pylori activity at a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 128 mu g/mL and at a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 256 mu g/mL. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed significant morphological changes of the bacterial cell as a response to a sub-MIC of paepalantine, suggesting a penicillin-binding protein (PBP) inhibition. Computational studies were carried out in order to study binding modes for paepalantine in PBP binding sites, exploring the active and allosteric sites. The data from the present study indicates that paepalantine exhibits significant anti-H. pylori activity, most likely by inhibiting membrane protein synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available