4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Enhanced Delivery and Effects of Acid Sphingomyelinase by ICAM-1-Targeted Nanocarriers in Type B Niemann-Pick Disease Mice

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1686-1696

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.05.014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL98416, R37-HD28607]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency in type B Niemann-Pick disease leads to lysosomal sphingomyelin storage, principally affecting lungs, liver, and spleen. Infused recombinant enzyme is beneficial, yet its delivery to the lungs is limited and requires higher dosing than liver and spleen, leading to potentially adverse reactions. Previous studies showed increased enzyme pulmonary uptake by nanocarriers targeted to ICAM-1, a protein overexpressed during inflammation. Here, using polystyrene and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanocarriers, we optimized lung delivery by varying enzyme dose and nanocarrier concentration, verified endocytosis and lysosomal trafficking in vivo, and evaluated delivered activity and effects. Raising the enzyme load of nanocarriers progressively increased absolute enzyme delivery to all lung, liver, and spleen, over the naked enzyme. Varying nanocarrier concentration inversely impacted lung versus liver and spleen uptake. Mouse intravital and postmortem examination verified endocytosis, transcytosis, and lysosomal trafficking using nanocarriers. Compared to naked enzyme, nanocarriers increased enzyme activity in organs and reduced lung sphingomyelin storage and macrophage infiltration. Although old mice with advanced disease showed reactivity (pulmonary leukocyte infiltration) to injections, including buffer without carriers, antibody, or enzyme, younger mice with mild disease did not. We conclude that anti-ICAM nanocarriers may result in effective lung enzyme therapy using low enzyme doses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available