4.7 Article

Two multi-temporal datasets that track the enhanced landsliding after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake

Journal

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 35-55

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-11-35-2019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars of China [41622206]
  2. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [41521002]
  3. Fund for International Cooperation (NSFC-RCUK_NERC) [41661134010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We release two datasets that track the enhanced landsliding induced by the 2008 M-w 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake over a portion of the Longmen Mountains, at the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau (Sichuan, China). The first dataset is a geo-referenced multi-temporal polygon-based inventory of pre- and coseismic landslides, post-seismic remobilisations of coseismic landslide debris and post-seismic landslides (new failures). It covers 471 km(2) in the earthquake's epicentral area, from 2005 to 2018. The second dataset records the debris flows that occurred from 2008 to 2017 in a larger area (similar to 17000 km(2)), together with information on their triggering rainfall as recorded by a network of rain gauges. For some well-monitored events, we provide more detailed data on rainfall, discharge, flow depth and density. The datasets can be used to analyse, on various scales, the patterns of landsliding caused by the earthquake. They can be compared to inventories of landslides triggered by past or new earthquakes or by other triggers to reveal common or distinctive controlling factors. To our knowledge, no other inventories that track the temporal evolution of earthquake-induced mass wasting have been made freely available thus far. Our datasets can be accessed from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1405489. We also encourage other researchers to share their datasets to facilitate research on post-seismic geological hazards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available