4.6 Article

Enhanced performance of microbial fuel cell at low substrate concentrations by adsorptive anode

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 245-251

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.028

Keywords

Absorptive anode; mass transfer; granular activated carbon; microbial fuel cell

Funding

  1. International Program of MOST of China [2013DFG92240]
  2. Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20110002130009]
  3. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20121087922]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a microbial fuel cell (MFC) with granular activated carbon packed anode (GAC-MFC) is developed and compared with a MFC with granular graphite packed anode (GG-MFC), to evaluate the adsorptive effect of the granular activated carbon anode on MFC's performance. The current output of GAC-MFC (11.1 mA, 18.1 mA and 21.6 mA) is much higher than that of GG-MFC (4.87 mA, 12.5 mA and 17.9 mA) at low substrate COD concentrations (similar to 50, similar to 100 and similar to 200 mg/L) when a low external resistance (20 Omega) and high circulation flow rate (20 mL/min) are applied. The half-saturation constant (K-s) of GAC-MFC is about half as much as that of GG-MFC, suggesting that GAC-MFC has more affinity for anode substrate and deliver better kinetic performance than GG-MFC. Internal resistance distribution shows that mass diffusion resistance of GAC-MFC is at least 50% lower than that of GG-MFC when the substrate COD is similar to 50 mg/L, indicating that the adsorptive effect of granular activated carbon packed anode helps to effectively facilitate mass transfer at low COD concentrations. Otherwise, the substrates adsorbed on GAC surface also serve to buffer the impact of COD concentration plummeting in bulk solution. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available