4.8 Article

Tau-mediated iron export prevents ferroptotic damage after ischemic stroke

Journal

MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 1520-1530

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.171

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  3. Cooperative Research Center for Mental Health
  4. Alzheimer's Australia Dementia Research Foundation
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81722016, 81571236, 81271403, 81471304, 91632115]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XJGH013, 2017SCU12042]
  7. Recruitment Program of Global Young Experts of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional failure of tau contributes to age-dependent, iron-mediated neurotoxicity, and as iron accumulates in ischemic stroke tissue, we hypothesized that tau failure may exaggerate ischemia-reperfusion-related toxicity. Indeed, unilateral, transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) suppressed hemispheric tau and increased iron levels in young (3-month-old) mice and rats. Wild-type mice were protected by iron-targeted interventions: ceruloplasmin and amyloid precursor protein ectodomain, as well as ferroptosis inhibitors. At this age, tau-knockout mice did not express elevated brain iron and were protected against hemispheric reperfusion injury following MCAO, indicating that tau suppression may prevent ferroptosis. However, the accelerated age-dependent brain iron accumulation that occurs in tau-knockout mice at 12 months of age negated the protective benefit of tau suppression against MCAO-induced focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. The protective benefit of tau knockout was revived in older mice by iron-targeting interventions. These findings introduce tau-iron interaction as a pleiotropic modulator of ferroptosis and ischemic stroke outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available