4.7 Article

Emission Signatures from Sub-parsec Binary Supermassive Black Holes. II. Effect of Accretion Disk Wind on Broad Emission Lines

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 870, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeff0

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; methods: analytical; quasars: emission lines

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX15AK84G]
  2. Research Corporation for Science Advancement through a Cottrell Scholar Award
  3. National Science Foundation [AST-1211677, PHY-1607611, AST-1211756]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an improved semi-analytic model for calculation of the broad optical emission-line signatures from sub-parsec supermassive black hole binaries (SBHBs) in circumbinary disks. The second-generation model improves on the treatment of radiative transfer by taking into account the effect of the radiation-driven accretion disk wind on the properties of the emission-line profiles. Analysis of 42.5 million modeled emission-line profiles shows that correlations between the profile properties and SBHB parameters identified in the first-generation model are preserved, indicating that their diagnostic power is not diminished. The profile shapes are a more sensitive measure of the binary orbital separation and the degree of alignment of the black hole mini-disks and are less sensitive to the SBHB mass ratio and orbital eccentricity. We also find that modeled profile shapes are more compatible with the observed sample of SBHB candidates than with our control sample of regular active galactic nuclei. Furthermore, if the observed sample of SBHBs is made up of genuine binaries, it must include compact systems with comparable masses and misaligned mini-disks. We note that the model described in this paper can be used to interpret the observed emission-line profiles once a sample of confirmed SBHBs is available but cannot be used to prove that the observed SBHB candidates are true binaries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available