4.7 Article

A phylogeny of Southern Hemisphere whelks (Gastropoda: Buccinulidae) and concordance with the fossil record

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 367-381

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.06.018

Keywords

Buccinulum; Buccinidae; Kelletia; Marine snail; Penion; Systematics

Funding

  1. Royal Society of New Zealand Te Aparangi Marsden Fund grant [12-MAU-008]
  2. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Te Tipu Putaiao Postdoctoral Fellowship [CONT-22922-TTP-MAU]
  3. Department Of Conservation Taxonomic and Threat Status Information fund [RIF 4718]
  4. New Zealand Government under New Zealand International Polar Year Census of Antarctic Marine Life Project [TAN0802, So001IPY, IPY2007-01]
  5. Ministry of Fisheries [TAN0402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under current marine snail taxonomy, the majority of whelks from the Southern Hemisphere (Buccinulidae) are hypothesised to represent a monophyletic Glade that has evolved independently from Northern Hemisphere taxa (Buccinidae). Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial genomic and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data indicates that Southern Hemisphere taxa are not monophyletic, and results suggest that dispersal across the equator has occurred in both directions. New Zealand buccinulid whelks, noted for their high endemic diversity, are also found to not be monophyletic. Using independent fossil calibrations, estimated genetic divergence dates show remarkable concordance with the fossil record of the Penion and Kelletia. The divergence dates and the geographic distribution of the genera through time implies that some benthic marine snails are capable of dispersal over long distances, despite varied developmental strategies. Phylogenetic results also indicate that one species, P. benthicolus belongs in Antarctoneptunea. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available