4.7 Article

Phylogenetic analysis of Placobdella (Hirudinea: Rhynchobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) with consideration of COI variation

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 234-248

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.06.017

Keywords

Phylogeny; Leech; Placobdella; COI variation; Species delimitation

Funding

  1. NSERC Discovery Grants
  2. Royal Ontario Museum through Schad Conservation Funds
  3. Royal Ontario Museum through Olle Engkvist Byggmastare Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Placobdella is a genus of blood-feeding leeches in the family Glossiphoniidae. Historically, species of Placobdella have posed difficulty for systematists owing to a lack of informative morphological characters and the preponderance of inadequate or incomplete species descriptions. Here, we conduct a phylogenetic analysis of 55 individuals representing 20 of the 24 currently recognized nominal taxa using COI, ND1, 12S rDNA and ITS sequences under parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. We also examine the isolated COI phylogeny for the genus using an expanded dataset encompassing three additional species not included in the concatenated dataset. Finally, we assess genetic variation at the COI locus to validate initial specimen identifications and estimate how COI variation may reflect species boundaries. We conclude that Placobdella is a monophyletic group that places as the sister group to a Glade formed by the genera Haementeria and Helobdella. We discuss the evolutionary implications of several internal relationships that are robustly resolved by all three optimality criteria, paying particular attention to the apparent fluidity of morphological characters exhibited by members of Placobdella. We also find preliminary evidence for the presence of cryptic and undescribed diversity within the genus. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available