4.5 Article

Profiling of CH4 background mixing ratio in the lower troposphere with Raman lidar: a feasibility experiment

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 119-128

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-119-2019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. labex CaPPA
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) through the PIA (Programme d'Investissement d'Avenir) [ANR-11-LABX-0005-01]
  3. Regional Council Nord-Pas de Calais
  4. European Funds for Regional Economic Development (FEDER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of methane profiling in the lower troposphere using LILAS Raman lidar from the Lille University observatory platform (France). The lidar is based on a frequency-tripled Nd:YAG laser, and nighttime profiling up to 4000 with 100 m height resolution is possible for methane. Agreement between the measured photon-counting rate in the CH4 Raman channel in the free troposphere and numerical simulations for a typical CH4 background mixing ratio (2 ppm) confirms that CH4 Raman scattering is detected. The mixing ratio is calculated from the ratio of methane (395.7 nm) and nitrogen (386.7 nm) Raman backscatters, and within the planetary boundary layer, an increase of the CH4 mixing ratio, up to a factor of 2, is observed. Different possible interfering factors, such as leakage of the elastic signal and aerosol fluorescence, have been taken into consideration. Tests using backscattering from clouds confirmed that the filters in the Raman channel provide sufficient rejection of elastic scattering. The measured methane profiles do not correlate with aerosol backscattering, which corroborates the hypothesis that, in the planetary boundary layer, not aerosol fluorescence but CH4 is observed. However, the fluorescence contribution cannot be completely excluded and, for future measurements, we plan to install an additional control channel close to 393 nm, where no strong Raman lines exist and only fluorescence can be observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available