4.7 Article

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Methodology and projections for joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023508

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0007901, DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT150100074]
  3. MINECO [ESP2013-48274-C3-1-P, ESP2014-58384-C3-1-P, ESP2015-66861-C3-1-R, AYA2015-71825, ESP2015-88861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2012-0234, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  4. DOE [DE-SC0015975]
  5. Sloan Foundation [FG-2016-6443]
  6. NASA through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship - Chandra X-ray Center [PF5-160138]
  7. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy
  9. U.S. National Science Foundation
  10. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  11. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  12. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  13. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  14. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  15. Center for Cosmology andAstro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  16. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  17. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  18. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo 'a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  19. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  20. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  21. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  22. Argonne National Laboratory
  23. University of California at Santa Cruz
  24. University of Cambridge
  25. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  26. University of Chicago
  27. University College London
  28. DES-Brazil Consortium
  29. University of Edinburgh
  30. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Zurich
  31. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  32. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  33. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai
  34. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  35. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  36. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  37. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  38. University of Michigan
  39. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  40. University of Nottingham
  41. Ohio State University
  42. University of Pennsylvania
  43. University of Portsmouth
  44. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  45. Stanford University
  46. University of Sussex
  47. Texas AM University
  48. OzDES Membership Consortium
  49. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171, PLR-1248097]
  50. European Union
  51. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  52. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program [FP7/2007-2013]
  53. ERC [240672, 291329, 306478]
  54. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics [CE110001020]
  55. NSF Physics Frontier Center [PHY-0114422]
  56. Kavli Foundation
  57. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [947]
  58. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  59. Australian Research Council [FT150100074] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  60. STFC [ST/R000972/1, ST/M001334/1, ST/N000668/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Collaboration used a joint fit to two-point correlations between these observables to place tight constraints on cosmology (T. M. C. Abbott et al. (Dark Energy Survey Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 043526 (2018)). In this work, we develop the methodology to extend the DES Year 1 joint probes analysis to include cross-correlations of the optical survey observables with gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background as measured by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Using simulated analyses, we show how the resulting set of five two-point functions increases the robustness of the cosmological constraints to systematic errors in galaxy lensing shear calibration. Additionally, we show that contamination of the SPT+Planck cosmic microwave background lensing map by the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is a potentially large source of systematic error for two-point function analyses but show that it can be reduced to acceptable levels in our analysis by masking clusters of galaxies and imposing angular scale cuts on the two-point functions. The methodology developed here will be applied to the analysis of data from the DES, the SPT, and Planck in a companion work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available