4.5 Article

From Field Experiments to Regional Forecasts: Upscaling Wheat Grain and Forage Yield Response to Acidic Soils

Journal

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 287-302

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2018.03.0206

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
  2. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Kansas Cooperative Extension Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We combined field studies to regional soil databases with the objective of presenting a protocol to forecast regional gains in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) forage and grain yield and revenue, from liming or selecting a variety tolerant to acidic soils. First, we developed forage and grain yield response curves to soil pH using a variety by soil pH study conducted during 3 yr (2013-2015) at two Oklahoma locations. Second, we used a database of soil pH samples representing 93% of the wheat growing region of the state (n = 11,905) coupled with 15-yr average county yield and harvested area to estimate potential gains for grain-only and dual-purpose scenarios. Relative grain yield maximized at soil pH of 5.8 for sensitive varieties and 4.8 for tolerant varieties. Forage yield maximized at soil pH of 6.0 for sensitive varieties and 5.5 for tolerant varieties. About 35% of the region had pH limiting to dual-purpose and 28% to grain-only production. Liming could improve grain-only statewide yield in 0.14 Mg ha(-1) and revenue in US$19 ha(-1), and adoption of tolerant varieties could increase yield in 0.11 Mg ha(-1) and revenue in $10 ha(-1). Liming could improve dual-purpose revenue in $37 ha(-1) and variety selection in $28 ha(-1) due to improved yield and forage. Potential additional statewide wheat production resulting from variety selection is 53,800 Mg and from liming 82,500 Mg. Our protocol can be used to aid development of agricultural policies and research prioritization at regional levels where acidic soils are prevalent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available