4.6 Review

Practical considerations for choosing a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Journal

MOLECULAR NEURODEGENERATION
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13024-017-0231-7

Keywords

Transgenic mouse; Knockout; Knock-in; Amyloid precursor protein; APP; A beta; Tau; MAPT; TREM2; Apolipoprotein E; ApoE

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [AG058188, AG056028, AG054160, NS092615, AG020670, AG032051, AG054111, NS093652]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is behaviorally identified by progressive memory impairment and pathologically characterized by the triad of beta-amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and neurodegeneration. Genetic mutations and risk factors have been identified that are either causal or modify the disease progression. These genetic and pathological features serve as basis for the creation and validation of mouse models of AD. Efforts made in the past quarter-century have produced over 100 genetically engineered mouse lines that recapitulate some aspects of AD clinicopathology. These models have been valuable resources for understanding genetic interactions that contribute to disease and cellular reactions that are engaged in response. Here we focus onmouse models that have been widely used stalwarts of the field or that are recently developed bellwethers of the future. Rather than providing a summary of each model, we endeavor to compare and contrast the genetic approaches employed and to discuss their respective advantages and limitations. We offer a critical account of the variables which may contribute to inconsistent findings and the factors that should be considered when choosing a model and interpreting the results. We hope to present an insightful review of current AD mouse models and to provide a practical guide for selecting models best matched to the experimental question at hand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available