4.6 Review

The Role of WD40-Repeat Protein 62 (MCPH2) in Brain Growth: Diverse Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Required for Cortical Development

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 7, Pages 5409-5424

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-017-0778-x

Keywords

Neural stem cells; Neural signalling; Corticogenesis; c-Jun N-terminal kinase; Microccphaly

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1046032]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT120100193]
  3. Cancer Council [APP1101931]
  4. University of Melbourne
  5. University of Queensland
  6. Australian Research Council [FT120100193] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic disruptions of spindle/centrosome-associated WD40-repeat protein 62 (WDR62) are causative for autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) and a broader range of cortical malformations. Since the identification of WDR62 as encoded by the MCPH2 locus in 2010, recent studies that have deleted/depleted WDR62 in various animal models of cortical development have highlighted conserved functions in brain growth. Here, we provide a timely review of our current understanding of WDR62 contributions in the self-renewal, expansion and fate specification of neural stem and progenitor cells that are critical for neocortical development. Recent studies have revealed multiple functions for WDR62 in the regulation of spindle organization, mitotic progression and the duplication and biased inheritance of centrosomes during asymmetric divisions. We also discuss recently elaborated WDR62 interaction partners that include Aurora and c-Jun N-terminal kinases as part of complex signalling mechanisms that may define its neural functions. These studies provide new insights into the molecular and cellular processes that are required for brain formation and implicated in the genesis of primary microcephaly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available