4.6 Article

Self-assembly flower-like porous carbon nanosheet powders for higher lithium-ion storage capacity

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages 308-315

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.098

Keywords

lithium-ion batteries; self-assembly; carbon nanosheet powders; spray drying; path-memory effect

Funding

  1. natural science foundation of China [21303062]
  2. science and technology projects of Guangdong Province [2013B090500025]
  3. science and technology projects of Guangzhou [2014J4100027, 2014Y2-00012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the concepts of self-assembly and re-construction, flower-like porous carbon nanosheet powders (CNPs), which exhibit almost double theoretical capacity of prototype graphite powders, are prepared by spray drying a suspension of graphite oxide and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and subsequent thermally-reducing treatment. The functional groups, edges, and defective sites of nanoscale graphite oxide intermediate and their interaction with CTAB additive are utilized to construct the CNP micro-/nanostructure with abundant wrinkles. This unique micro-/nanostructure not only facilitates coating CNPs on the anode substrate of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) but also improves their electrochemical performances. Specifically, these CNPs display an initial specific capacity of approximately 807 mAh g(-1) and a stable capacity of approximately 650 mAh g(-1) after the 6th cycle at a charge-discharge current of 100 mA g(-1). And a capacity of approximately 600 mAh g(-1) is still kept after 100 cycles, showing the as-prepared CNPs have promising application in the LIBs. In addition, based on the insertion/extraction 'path-memory effect', a storage mechanism of lithium ions is proposed to explain the importance of wrinkles in the CNPs to the capacity and cycling stability. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available