4.6 Article

Green solvent-processed efficient non-fullerene organic solar cells enabled by low-bandgap copolymer donors with EDOT side chains

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 716-726

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta10882j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21825502, 51573107, 91633301, 21432005]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme 2017-2-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, by engineering ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) side chains we developed two novel low-bandgap copolymers, namely, PTB-EDOT and PTB-EDOTS, for fabricating green solvent-processed but highly efficient non-fullerene organic solar cells (NF-PSCs). This molecular design strategy not only featured copolymers with excellent solubility in the green solvent 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (MeTHF) but also introduced a low-lying HOMO level, a high extinction coefficient and high crystallinity. PTB-EDOTS-based binary blend NF-PSCs exhibited a PCE of 9.28% when ITIC-Th was used as the acceptor and chlorobenzene/1-chloronaphthalene (CB/CN) as the processing solvent. When MeTHF was used instead of CB/CN, the PCE was further increased to 10.18%. To compensate for the weak absorption in the short-wavelength region and further optimize the morphology, a polymer donor (J71) with a large bandgap was added as a third component to fabricate ternary blend NF-PSCs. After the addition of 20wt% of J71, NF-PSCs exhibited improved absorption and fine-tuned morphology. Charge transport and energy transfer were also promoted by this ternary blend strategy via an electron cascade effect, a hole back phenomenon and a Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) process, which increased the maximum PCE to 12.26% with a very high fill factor (FF) of 75.6%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best performance achieved by NF-PSCs using green solvents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available