4.7 Article

Mass composition of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays with the Telescope Array Surface Detector data

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.022002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [JP21000002, JP19104006, JP15H05693, JP15H05741, JPH26707011]
  2. Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (ICRR), The University of Tokyo
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-0601915, PHY-1404495, PHY-1404502, PHY-1607727]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017K1A4A3015188, 2016R1A2B4014967, 2017R1A2A1A05071429, 2016R1A5A1013277]
  5. IISN Project [4.4502.13]
  6. Belgian Science Policy [IUAP VII/37]
  7. Russian Science Foundation [17-72-20291]
  8. State of Utah
  9. University of Utah through the Office of the Vice President for Research
  10. Russian Science Foundation [17-72-20291] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results on ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECR) mass composition obtained with the Telescope Array surface detector are presented. The analysis employs the Boosted Decision tree (BDT) multivariate analysis built upon 14 observables related to both the properties of the shower front and the lateral distribution function. The multivariate classifier is trained with Monte-Carlo sets of events induced by the primary protons and iron. An average atomic mass of UHECR is presented for energies 10(18.0)-10(20.0) eV. The average atomic mass of primary particles shows no significant energy dependence and corresponds to < ln A > = 2.0 +/- 0.1(stat.) +/- 0.44(syst:). The result is compared to the mass composition obtained by the Telescope Array with Xmax technique along with the results of other experiments. Possible systematic errors of the method are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available