4.7 Review

CO2 Capture in Metal-Organic Framework Adsorbents: An Engineering Perspective

Journal

ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsu.201800080

Keywords

adsorption-based separation; CO2 capture; engineering perspective; metal-organic frameworks; process design

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore [CENGas R-261-508-001-646]
  2. Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE AcRF Tier 1) [R-279-000-472-112, R-279-000-540-114]
  3. Agency for Science, Technology and Research [PSF 1521200078, IRG A1783c0015, IAF-PP A1789a0024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 emission has raised worldwide concerns because of its potential effects on climate change, species extinction, and plant nutrition deterioration. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are one class of crystalline adsorbent materials that are believed to be of huge potential in CO2 capture applications because of their advantages such as ultrahigh porosity, boundless chemical tunability, and surface functionality over traditional porous zeolites and activated carbon. In terms of chemistry, there are already many studies devoted to the synthesis of new functional MOFs. Some of the synthesized MOFs have been evaluated for CO2 capture at laboratory-scale. Several reviews have been published on this topic, but mainly from a chemistry and materials point of view. In this review, the authors focus on the engineering perspective on this topic, with emphases on material evaluation, performance judgment, and process design to address the engineering issues of these materials to be used as adsorbents in industrial CO2 capture. The current engineering evaluation approaches for MOFs are summarized, in a manner that could also be applied to other adsorbent materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available