4.6 Article

Electrochemical verification of the redox mechanism of FeS2 in a rechargeable lithium battery

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 784-789

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.096

Keywords

Iron pyrite; Li/FeS2 battery; Li/S battery; Impedance; Redox mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The redox mechanism of micro-sized FeS2 particles in a rechargeable lithium battery is studied by galvanostatic cycling and ac-impedance analysis. It is shown that FeS2 is irreversibly reduced on the first discharge, turning Li/FeS2 cell into a combination of Li/FeS and Li/S chemistries, as suggested by two distinct discharge plateaus at similar to 1.5 and 2.0 V, respectively. The first discharge consists of an irreversible conversion of FeS2 to Li2FeS2 intermediate and its subsequent reduction to metallic Fe and Li2S. The first discharge suffers an initial voltage delay, suggesting that the discharge progresses in a thermodynamic non-equilibrium condition. The initial voltage delay can be attributed to the large grain boundary resistance (GBR) of pristine FeS2 particles, which impedes the nucleation of a new solid Li2FeS2 phase causing high polarization. Ac-impedance spectra of the FeS2 cathode are composed of a semicircle and a straight sloping line, representative of an electrode reaction resistance (R-er) and a Li+ adsorption impedance, respectively. The R-er is found to decrease progressively during the first discharge and reaches a plateau when the cell is charged above 2.5 V vs. Li/Li+, being consistent with the model that FeS2 is irreversibly reduced during the first discharge and that the Li2S/Li2Sn redox couple is formed in recharge. It is indicated that Li/FeS2 batteries face the same problems as Li/S batteries, such as the dissolution of lithium polysulfide, the formation of a redox shuttle, and the loss of sulfur active material. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available