3.8 Article

Safety of diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in patients with echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary hypertension

Journal

RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 73-78

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.08.009

Keywords

Pulmonary hypertension; Bronchoscopy; Echocardiography; Right ventricular systolic pressure; Biopsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and treatment with anticoagulant agents could potentially increase the risk for bleeding/hemodynamic complications associated with bronchoscopic procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in patients with PH. Methods: A retrospective review of clinical records of patients with echocardiographic evidence of PH (right ventricular systolic pressure [RVSP] > 40 mm Hg) who underwent diagnostic FB between 2004 and 2016 at a single facility in Japan was conducted. Patients with no clinical evidence suggestive of PH who underwent FB during the same period were enrolled as a pairwise-matched control group; factors used in matching included age, sex, and performed procedures. Results: Overall, there were 45 patients in the PH group and 90 patients in the control group. Six (13%) patients in the PH group had severe PH (RVSP > 61 mm Hg). Forceps biopsies and transbronchial needle aspirations were performed in 62% and 13% of patients, respectively, in the PH group, and 58% and 13% of patients, respectively, in the control group. The total incidence of bleeding during FB was not significantly different between the two groups (18% versus 16%; p = 0.742). Vital signs recorded 2 h after FB were also not significantly different between the two groups. There were no episodes of cardiac arrhythmias or deaths associated with the FB procedures. Conclusions: The data suggest that diagnostic FB procedures can be performed safely in patients with echocardiographic evidence of PH. (C) 2018 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available