4.4 Article

Phenotypic and genotypic spectrum of congenital disorders of glycosylation type I and type II

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages 235-242

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.12.014

Keywords

Congenital disorders of glycosylation; N-glycosylation; Combined N- and O-glycosylation; Transferrin isoelectric focusing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are inborn defects of glycan metabolism. They are multisystem disorders. Analysis of transferrin isoforms is applied as a screening test for CDG type I (CDG-I) and type II (CDG-II). We performed a retrospective cohort study to determine spectrum of phenotype and genotype and prevalence of the different subtypes of CDG-I and CDG-II. Material and methods: All patients with CDG-I and CDG-II evaluated in our institution's Metabolic Genetics Clinics were included. Electronic and paper patient charts were reviewed. We set-up a high performance liquid chromatography transferrin isoelectric focusing (TIEF) method to measure transferrin isoforms in our Institution. We reviewed the literature for the rare CDG-I and CDG-II subtypes seen in our Institution. Results: Fifteen patients were included: 9 with PMM2-CDG and 6 with non-PMM2-CDG (one ALG3-CDG, one ALG9-CDG, two ALG11-CDG, one MPDU1-CDG and one ATP6V0A2-CDG). All patients with PMM2-CDG and 5 patients with non-PMM2-CDG showed abnormal TIEF suggestive of CDG-I or CDG-II pattern. In all patients, molecular diagnosis was confirmed either by single gene testing, targeted next generation sequencing for CDG genes, or by whole exome sequencing. Conclusion: We report 15 new patients with CDG-I and CDG-II. Whole exome sequencing will likely identify more patients with normal TIEF and expand the phenotypic spectrum of CDG-I and CDG-II. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available