3.8 Review

Airway hypoxia in lung transplantation

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 21-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2018.12.002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL095686, HL138473, HL122887, HL014985, HL129970]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung transplantation is a life-saving operation for patients with advanced lung disease. Pulmonary allografts eventually fail because of infection, thromboembolism, malignancy, airway complications, and chronic rejection, otherwise known as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Emerging evidence suggests that a highly compromised airway circulation contributes to the evolution of airway complications and CLAD. There are two significant causes of poor perfusion and airway hypoxia in lung transplantation: an abnormal bronchial circulation which causes airway complications and microvascular rejection which induces CLAD. At the time of transplantation, the bronchial artery circulation, a natural component of the airway circulatory anatomy, is not surgically connected, and bronchi distal to the anastomosis become hypoxic. Subsequently, the bronchial anastomosis is left to heal under ischemic conditions. Still later, the extant microvessels in transplant bronchi are subjected to alloimmune insults that can further negatively impact pulmonary function. This review describes how airway tissue hypoxia evolves in lung transplantation, why depriving oxygenation in the bronchi and more distal bronchioles contributes to disease pathology and what therapeutic interventions are currently emerging to address these vascular injuries. Improving anastomotic vascular healing at the time of transplantation and preventing microvascular loss during acute rejection episodes are two steps that could limit airway hypoxia and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available