4.6 Article

Sensitivity of centennial mass loss projections of the Amundsen basin to the friction law

Journal

CRYOSPHERE
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 177-195

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-13-177-2019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-15-CE01-0005-01]
  2. Labex OSUG@2020 [ANR10 LABX56]
  3. Rhone-Alpes region [CPER07-13 CIRA]
  4. OSUG@2020 labex [ANR10 LABX56]
  5. Equip@Meso project of the programme Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-10-EQPX-29-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reliable projections of ice sheets' future contributions to sea-level rise require models that are able to accurately simulate grounding-line dynamics, starting from initial states consistent with observations. Here, we simulate the centennial evolution of the Amundsen Sea Embayment in response to a prescribed perturbation in order to assess the sensitivity of mass loss projections to the chosen friction law, depending on the initialisation strategy. To this end, three different model states are constructed by inferring both the initial basal shear stress and viscosity fields with various relative weights. Then, starting from each of these model states, prognostic simulations are carried out using a Weertman, a Schoof and a Budd friction law, with different parameter values. Although the sensitivity of projections to the chosen friction law tends to decrease when more weight is put on viscosity during initialisation, it remains significant for the most physically acceptable of the constructed model states. Independently of the considered model state, the Weertman law systematically predicts the lowest mass losses. In addition, because of its particular dependence on effective pressure, the Budd friction law induces significantly different grounding-line retreat patterns than the other laws and predicts significantly higher mass losses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available