4.8 Article

How the Eukaryotic Replisome Achieves Rapid and Efficient DNA Replication

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 105-116

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Francis Crick Institute
  2. Cancer Research UK [FC001066]
  3. UK Medical Research Council [FC001066]
  4. Wellcome Trust [FC001066]
  5. Wellcome Senior Investigator Award [106252/Z/14/Z]
  6. ERC Advanced Grant [669424-CHROMOREP]
  7. FEBS Return-to-Europe fellowship
  8. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds PhD fellowship
  9. Cancer Research UK [15669] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Cancer Research UK
  11. The Francis Crick Institute [10066] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. The Francis Crick Institute [10349, 10397] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Wellcome Trust [106252/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The eukaryotic replisome is a molecular machine that coordinates the Cdc45-MCM-GINS (CMG) replicative DNA helicase with DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon and other proteins to copy the leading- and lagging-strand templates at rates between 1 and 2 kb min(-1). We have now reconstituted this sophisticated machine with purified proteins, beginning with regulated CMG assembly and activation. We show that replisome-associated factors Mrc1 and Csm3/Tof1 are crucial for in vivo rates of replisome progression. Additionally, maximal rates only occur when DNA polymerase epsilon catalyzes leading-strand synthesis together with its processivity factor PCNA. DNA polymerase delta can support leading-strand synthesis, but at slower rates. DNA polymerase delta is required for lagging-strand synthesis, but surprisingly also plays a role in establishing leading-strand synthesis, before DNA polymerase epsilon engagement. We propose that switching between these DNA polymerases also contributes to leading-strand synthesis under conditions of replicative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available