3.8 Article

Microcredit and technology adoption Sustained pathways to improve farmers' prosperity in Indonesia

Journal

AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 85-106

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/AFR-05-2017-0033

Keywords

Structural equation modelling; Agricultural finance; Socio-economic factors; Intensive chili farming

Funding

  1. Indonesia Project of Crawford School ANU - SMERU research grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of microcredit and agronomic technology on farm households' prosperity, and to determine important factors affecting farmers' access to microcredit and technology adoption in Indonesian intensive farming. Design/methodology/approach The focus of the study was farmers engaging with chili-based agribusiness in rural areas. Data for this study were compiled from a survey that interviewed 250 farm households. Samples of the study were randomly selected from chili farming community in three regions of Java during 2013-2014. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings Microcredit provided positive direct and indirect impacts on household prosperity. Microcredit indirectly impacted the well-being through the mediation of technology adoption. Farmers' characteristics and agribusiness environment determined farmers' decision to access microcredit and adopt advanced technology. Microcredit and technology have enhanced farmers' well-being through pathways that enabled farmers to develop farming scale. Practical implications The government should offer more alternatives to advanced technology and flexible procedures of access to credit at the same time to ensure sustained pathways of rural economic growth in Indonesia. Originality/value This paper applied a SEM to a proposition of simultaneous causal interrelations among microcredit, technology and farmers' prosperity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available