4.5 Article

Sympathetic Signaling Reactivates Quiescent Disseminated Prostate Cancer Cells in the Bone Marrow

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 1644-1655

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0132

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [PO1-CA093900]
  2. NIH/NCI Tumor Microenvironment Network [U54-CA163124]
  3. Department of Defense [W81XWH-14-1-0403]
  4. Prostate Cancer Foundation Research Award [16CHAL05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical observations have identified an association between psychologic stress and cancer relapse, suggesting that the sympathetic nervous system/norepinephrine (NE) plays a role in reactivation of dormant disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow niche. Here, the mechanism by which NE regulates prostate cancer DTCs in the marrow is explored. NE directly stimulated prostate cancer cell proliferation through beta 2-adrenergic receptors (ADRB2). NE also altered prostate cancer proliferation in the marrow niche by indirectly downregulating the secretion of the dormancy inducing molecule growth arrest specific-6 (GAS6) expressed by osteoblasts. These observations were confirmed in cocultures of prostate cancer cells expressing the fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell-cycle reporters (FUCCI) and osteoblasts isolated from GAS6-deficient (GAS6(-/-)) animals.A novel ex vivo model system, using femurs harvested from GAS6(-/-) or GAS6(-/-) mice, was used to confirm these results. As in coculture, when prostate cancer cells were injected into the marrow cavities of GAS6(-/-) femurs, NEaltered the prostate cancer cell cycle. However, NE had less of an impact on prostate cancer cells in femur explants isolated from GAS6(-/-) mice. Together, this study demonstrates that NE reactivates prostate cancer cell cycling through both a direct action on prostate cancer cells and indirectly on adjacent niche cells. (C) 2017 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available