Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Gender bias: track revisions and appeals
Julie Overbaugh
NATURE (2017)
Journals invite too few women to referee
Jory Lerback et al.
NATURE (2017)
Analyzing the Publish-or-Perish Paradigm with Game Theory: The Prisoner's Dilemma and a Possible Escape
T. C. Erren et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2016)
BIBLIOMETRICS Publishing elite turns against impact factor
Ewen Callaway
NATURE (2016)
The quiet rise of the NIH's hot new metric
Gautam Naik
NATURE (2016)
Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level
B. Ian Hutchins et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)
Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?
Ferric C. Fang et al.
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY (2015)
Scientists must work harder on equality
Meg Urry
NATURE (2015)
Increasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical research
Anthony Bowen et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)
Reproducibility in Science Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research
C. Glenn Begley et al.
CIRCULATION RESEARCH (2015)
Assessing Value in Biomedical Research The PQRST of Appraisal and Reward
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
NIH plans to enhance reproducibility
Francis S. Collins et al.
NATURE (2014)
Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
Bruce Alberts et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
Ross Cagan
DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS (2013)
Impact fact-or fiction?
Bernd Pulverer
EMBO JOURNAL (2013)
We Have Met the Enemy, and It Is Us
Mark Johnston
GENETICS (2013)
Eliminating the impact of the Impact Factor
Tom Misteli
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY (2013)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Identifying translational science within the triangle of biomedicine
Griffin M. Weber
JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2013)
No shortcuts for research assessment
Stefano Bertuzzi et al.
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL (2013)
Global gender disparities in science
Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al.
NATURE (2013)
Impact Factor Distortions
Bruce Alberts
SCIENCE (2013)
Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact
Dashun Wang et al.
SCIENCE (2013)
Expert Failure: Re-evaluating Research Assessment
Jonathan A. Eisen et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2013)
The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations
Adam Eyre-Walker et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2013)
Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing
Allen W. Wilhite et al.
SCIENCE (2012)
Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity
Carole J. Lee et al.
HYPATIA-A JOURNAL OF FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY (2011)
Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity
Stefania I. Papatheodorou et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information
Michael J. Stringer et al.
PLOS ONE (2008)
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
Amber E. Budden et al.
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2008)
Persistent nepotism in peer-review
Ulf Sandstrom et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2008)
Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study
Lutz Bornmann et al.
RESEARCH EVALUATION (2006)
Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market
MJ Salganik et al.
SCIENCE (2006)
Challenging the tyranny of impact factors
D Colquhoun
NATURE (2003)