4.6 Review

Bile acids and colon cancer: Is FXR the solution of the conundrum?

Journal

MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 66-74

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2017.04.002

Keywords

Bile acids; Nuclear receptors; Colorectal cancer; Gene expression; Gut-liver axis

Funding

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG 18987]
  2. NR-NET FP7 Marie Curie ITN
  3. Italian Ministry of University and Education (Finanziamenti per la Ricerca di Base IDEAS) [RBID08C9N7, PRIN 2010FHH32M-002]
  4. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2008-1143546, GR-2010-2314703]
  5. University of Bari [IDEA GRBA0802SJ-2008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diet and lifestyle habits have a profound impact on the pathophysiology of many diseases. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and its etiology is strongly influenced by nutrition and high fat/high carbohydrate Western-style diet. Human epidemiological and animal studies have shown that colonic cancer risk is also related to faecal bile acid concentration. Abnormally high levels of bile acids (BA) trigger the colonic mucosa with a plethora of detrimental effects such as DNA oxidative damage, inflammation and hyperproliferation that highly promote CRC progression in postinitiation phase. The Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor that transcriptionally mediates the signalling activity of BAs. FXR regulates BA metabolism mainly maintaining BA concentrations within a physiological range, thereby preventing BA-induced cytotoxicity. In fact, loss of FXR is associated with higher BA concentrations and with a pro-tumorigenic phenotype. Here we explore the liaison connecting nutrition, intestinal epithelium renewal, BA and their nuclear receptor FXR in CRC. Moreover, we summarize evidence linking BA and CRC, as well as examine current understanding of the protumoral actions of BA and the bona fide antitumoral properties of FXR. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available