4.5 Article

Carcinogenic risk and Bisphenol A exposure: A focus on molecular aspects in endoderm derived glands

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 457, Issue C, Pages 20-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.01.027

Keywords

Bisphenol A; Thyroid cancer; Pancreatic cancer; Prostate cancer; Nuclear receptors; Stress/NF-kB pathway

Funding

  1. Italian Workers' Compensation Authority [12010]
  2. Italian Ministry of Health [RF 2010-2309484]
  3. Regione Campania (Sensor) [23, 5/2002, CUP:F82I14001270002]
  4. InterOmics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological and experimental evidence associates the exposure to Bisphenol A with the increase of cancer risk in several organs, including prostate. BPA targets different pathways involved in carcinogenicity including the Nuclear Receptors (i.e. estrogen and androgen receptors), stress regulated proteins and, finally, epigenetic changes. Here, we analyse BPA-dependent carcinogenesis in endoderm-derived glands, thyroid, liver, pancreas and prostate focusing on cell signalling, DNA damage repair pathways and epigenetic modifications. Mainly, we gather molecular data evidencing harmful effects at doses relevant for human risk (low-closes). Since few molecular data are available, above all for the pancreas, we analysed transcriptomic data generated in our laboratory to suggest possible mechanisms of BPA carcinogenicity in endoderm derived glands, discussing the role of nuclear receptors and stress/NF-kappa B pathways. We evidence that an in vitro toxicogenomic approach might suggest mechanisms of toxicity applicable to cells having the same developmental origin. Although we cannot draw firm conclusions, published data summarized in this review suggest that exposure to BPA, primarily during the developmental stages, represents a risk for carcinogenesis of endoderm-derived glands. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available