4.6 Article

Experimental study of mass transport in PEMFCs: Through plane permeability and molecular diffusivity in GDLs

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 160-171

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.100

Keywords

Polymer electrolyte fuel cell; Mass transport; Molecular diffusion; Gas permeability; Gas diffusion media

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. Government of Alberta Small Equipment Grant Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental study of convective-diffusive transport in polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFCs) porous materials is presented. The study is used to estimate through-plane viscous permeability and effective molecular diffusivity of different gas diffusion layers (GDLs). A diffusion bridge based experimental setup is used for molecular diffusivity measurements, with oxygen and nitrogen flowing across the bridge. The pressure difference across the bridge is adjusted to control convective transport. The oxygen transport across porous media is measured using an oxygen sensor, and experimental data is fitted to a combined Fick's and Darcy's model to estimate effective diffusivity. To measure permeability, a variation of the diffusion bridge is used, where a single gas is forced to go through the GDL. The pressure drop across the GDL is measured, and fitted to Darcy's law to estimate viscous permeability. Through-plane permeability and effective molecular diffusivity are measured for several Toray samples with different polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) loading. Results show that permeability varies with PTFE loading between 1.13 x 10(-11) -0.35 x 10(-11) m(2) and diffusibility between 0.209 - 0.071. Increase in the PTFE content in GDLs was found to have an adverse effect on permeability and diffusibility. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available