4.5 Review

Systematic review of definitions and outcome measures for return of bowel function after gastrointestinal surgery

Journal

BJS OPEN
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.102

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Delphi research programme
  2. Bowel Disease Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundIleus is common after gastrointestinal surgery and has been identified as a research priority. Several issues have limited previous research, including a widely accepted definition and agreed outcome measure. This review is the first stage in the development of a core outcome set for the return of bowel function after gastrointestinal surgery. It aims to characterize the extent of variation in current outcome reporting. MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and the Cochrane Library was performed for 1990-2017. RCTs of adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, including at least one reported measure relating to return of bowel function, were eligible. Trial registries were searched across the same period for ongoing and completed (but not published) RCTs. Definitions of ileus and outcome measures describing the return of bowel function were extracted. ResultsOf 5670 manuscripts screened, 215 (reporting 217 RCTs) were eligible. Most RCTs involved patients undergoing colorectal surgery (161 of 217, 742 per cent). A total of 784 outcomes were identified across all published RCTs, comprising 73 measures (clinical: 63, 86 per cent; radiological: 6, 8 per cent; physiological: 4, 5 per cent). The most commonly reported outcome measure was time to first passage of flatus' (140 of 217, 645 per cent). The outcomes ileus' and prolonged ileus' were defined infrequently and variably. ConclusionOutcome reporting for the return of bowel function after gastrointestinal surgery is variable and not fit for purpose. An agreed core outcome set will improve the consistency, reliability and clinical value of future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available