4.5 Article

Width-dependent structural stability and magnetic properties of monolayer zigzag MoS2 nanoribbons

Journal

MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0217984917500178

Keywords

MoS2 nanoribbon; structural stability; magnetic property; first-principles study

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation (NSF) of China [10704059, 11204232, 11074196, 1374237, 11304383]
  2. Shannxi Postdoctoral Sustentation Fund, China [2016BSHEDZZ78]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2012jdgz04]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First-principles study based on density functional theory has been employed to in a investigate width-dependent structural stability and magnetic properties of monolayer z zigzag MoS2 nanoribbons (ZZ-MoS2 NRs). The width N = 4-6 (the numbers of zigzag Mo-S chains along the ribbon length) are considered. The results show that all studied ZZ-MoS2 NRs are less stable than two-dimensional MoS2 monolayer, exhibiting that a broader width ribbon behaves better structural stability and an inversely proportional relationship between the structural stability (or the ribbon with) and boundary S-Mo interaction. Electronic states imply that all ZZ-MoS2 NRs exhibit magnetic properties, regardless of their widths. Total magnetic moment increases with the increasing width N, which is mainly ascribed to the decreasing S-Mo interaction of the two zigzag edges. In order to confirm this reason, a uniaxial tension strain is applied to ZZ-MoS2 NRs. It has been found that, with the increasing tension strain, the bond length of boundary S-Mo increases, at the same time, the magnetic moment increases also. Our results suggest the rational applications of ZZ-MoS2 NRs in nanoelectronics and spintronics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available