4.8 Article

Topology and porosity control of metal-organic frameworks through linker functionalization

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 1186-1192

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8sc04220a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-18-1-0003]
  2. ARO-STTR [W911SR18C0031]
  3. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF) [NNCI-1542205]
  4. MRSEC program at the Materials Research Center [NSF DMR-1720139]
  5. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  6. Keck Foundation
  7. State of Illinois, through the IIN
  8. NSF [CHE-1048773, DMR-0521267]
  9. State of Illinois and International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  10. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tetratopic organic linkers have been extensively used in Zr-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) where diverse topologies have been observed. Achieving meticulous control over the topologies to tune the pore sizes and shapes of the resulting materials, however, remains a great challenge. Herein, by introducing substituents to the backbone of tetratopic linkers to affect the linker conformation, phase-pure Zr-MOFs with different topologies and porosity were successfully obtained under the same synthetic conditions. The conversion of CO2 to valuable cyclic carbonates is a promising route for the mitigation of the greenhouse gas. Owing to the presence of substrate accessible Lewis acidic Zr(IV) sites in the 8-connected Zr-6 nodes, the Zr-MOFs in this study have been investigated as heterogenous acid catalysts for CO2 cycloaddition to styrene oxide. The MOFs exhibited drastically different catalytic activities depending on their distinct pore structures. Compared to previously reported MOF materials, a superior catalytic activity was observed with the mesoporous NU-1008, giving an almost 100% conversion under mild conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available