4.7 Article

Complex Langevin and boundary terms

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014512

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [Sta 283/16-2]
  2. DFG grant Heisenberg Programme [SE 2466/1-2]
  3. High Performance and Cloud Computing Group at the Zentrum fur Datenverarbeitung of the University of Tubingen
  4. state of Baden-Wurttemberg through bwHPC
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG) [INST 37/935-1 FUGG]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As is well known the complex Langevin (CL) method sometimes fails to converge or converges to the wrong limit. We identified one reason for this long ago: insufficient decay of the probability density either near infinity or near poles of the drift, leading to boundary terms that spoil the formal argument for correctness. To gain a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, we analyze the emergence of such boundary terms thoroughly in a simple model, where analytic results can be compared with numerics. We also show how some simple modification stabilizes the CL process in such a way that it can produce results agreeing with direct integration. Besides explicitly demonstrating the connection between boundary terms and correct convergence our analysis also suggests a correctness criterion which could be applied in realistic lattice simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available