4.7 Article

Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background from Binary Black Holes and Binary Neutron Stars and Implications for LISA

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 871, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf581

Keywords

gravitational waves; instrumentation: detectors; methods: data analysis; stars: black holes; stars: neutron

Funding

  1. NSFC [11335012, 11575271, 11690021, 11747601]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB23000000]
  3. Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS
  5. U.S. National Science Foundation
  6. French Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  7. Italian Istituto Nazionale della Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  8. Dutch Nikhef

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advent of gravitational-wave and multimessenger astronomy has stimulated research on the formation mechanisms of binary black holes (BBHs) observed by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO)/Virgo. In the literature, the progenitors of these BBHs could be stellar-origin black holes (sBHs) or primordial black holes (PBHs). In this paper, we calculate the stochastic gravitational-wave background (SGWB) from BBHs, covering the astrophysical and primordial scenarios separately, together with the one from binary neutron stars (BNSs). Our results indicate that PBHs contribute a stronger SGWB than that from sBHs, and the total SGWB from both BBHs and BNSs has a high possibility of being detected by the future observing runs of LIGO/Virgo and the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). On the other hand, the SGWB from BBHs and BNSs also contributes an additional source of confusion noise to LISA's total noise curve, and then weakens LISA's detection abilities. For instance, the detection of massive black hole binary (MBHB) coalescences is one of the key missions of LISA, and the largest detectable redshift of MBHB mergers can be significantly reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available