4.7 Article

Efficient X-ray scintillating lead(ii)-based MOFs derived from rigid luminescent naphthalene motifs

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 1722-1731

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt04587a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21371170, 21601186]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642581]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB20000000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid-state X-ray scintillators are widely applied in medical imaging and space exploration. However, it is still a great challenge to probe into the intrinsic nature of scintillating behaviour due to the ambiguous structure-function relationship. Herein, four structure-defined X-ray scintillating Pb(II)-based metal-organic frameworks (SMOFs) were successfully obtained under solvothermal conditions, [Pb(1,4-ndc) (DMF)](n) (SMOF-1), [Pb(1,4-ndc)(DMA)](n) (SMOF-2), [Pb-2(2,6-ndc)(2)(H2O)](n)center dot nDMF (SMOF-3) and [Pb-4(2,6-ndc)(3)Cl-2] n (SMOF-4), where 1,4-H(2)ndc = 1,4-naphthalene dicarboxylate, 2,6-H(2)ndc = 2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate, DMF = N,N-dimethylformamide, and DMA = N,N-dimethylacetamide. SMOFs 1-4 show scintillating signals under X-rays triggered by a highly purified tungsten target. Compared with SMOFs 1-3, SMOF-4 exhibits excellent scintillating performance owing to its solvent-free and denser structure, which favours more efficient conversion ability of X-rays to visible light. X-ray stimulated luminescence (XSL) spectra present multiple emission peaks, which is further confirmed by wavelength-dependent luminescence spectra under UV-Vis light, and density of state and DFT calculations. The synergistic effects of heavy metal Pb(II) centres as effective X-ray absorbers and organic ligands as luminescent motifs endow these Pb(II)-based MOFs with application prospects in X-ray detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available