4.5 Article

Characterization of Sulfur and Nanostructured Sulfur Battery Cathodes in Electron Microscopy Without Sublimation Artifacts

Journal

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 155-162

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1431927617000058

Keywords

Cryo-TEM; airSEM; lithium sulfur; battery; energy

Funding

  1. Energy Materials Centre at Cornell
  2. Energy Frontier Research Centre - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, BES [DE-SC0001086]
  3. New York State Centre for Future Energy Systems (CFES)
  4. joint Center for Advanced Technology between Cornell University and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  5. New York State, Empire State Development Division of Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR) [C100126]
  6. NSF MRSEC program [DMR-1120296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries have the potential to provide higher energy storage density at lower cost than conventional lithium ion batteries. A key challenge for Li-S batteries is the loss of sulfur to the electrolyte during cycling. This loss can be mitigated by sequestering the sulfur in nanostructured carbon-sulfur composites. The nanoscale characterization of the sulfur distribution within these complex nanostructured electrodes is normally performed by electron microscopy, but sulfur sublimates and redistributes in the high-vacuum conditions of conventional electron microscopes. The resulting sublimation artifacts render characterization of sulfur in conventional electron microscopes problematic and unreliable. Here, we demonstrate two techniques, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and scanning electron microscopy in air (airSEM), that enable the reliable characterization of sulfur across multiple length scales by suppressing sulfur sublimation. We use cryo-TEM and airSEM to examine carbon-sulfur composites synthesized for use as Li-S battery cathodes, noting several cases where the commonly employed sulfur melt infusion method is highly inefficient at infiltrating sulfur into porous carbon hosts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available