4.4 Article

Extending a TAM-TTF model with perceptions toward telematics adoption

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/APJML-02-2018-0074

Keywords

Product adoption; Technology adoption model; Individual perceptions; Technology fitness model; Telemetic products

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST: 103-2410-H-270-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine a framework integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), individuals' task-technology fit (TTF) and perceptions toward adopting automobile telematics devices. Design/methodology/approach This study integrated the TAM with TTF to understand individual perceptions of a technology's value. In addition, the intrinsic motivational factors toward technology usage, including positive perceptions (perceived enjoyment, personal innovation and perceived uniqueness) and negative perceptions (perceived risk and performance gap), were considered in the model. Furthermore, the moderating effect of driving experience was examined. Findings The perceived usefulness (PU) of telematics as well as perceived ease of use (PEOU) affected drivers' adoption intentions. PEOU had a greater effect on adoption intentions than PU, and technology characteristics had a greater effect on TTF than task characteristics. Moreover, individuals' perceptions of perceived enjoyment and uniqueness affected PU and PEOU. The negative perceptions of perceived risk and performance gap affected PU and PEOU, respectively. Furthermore, driving experience significantly weakened the relationship between PU and intentions. Originality/value Telematics is a niche market due to the development of the Internet of Things, but users' adoption intentions remain unknown. This study constructed a more comprehensive model and tested the impacts of certain variables on telematics adoption, with driving experience as a crucial moderator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available