4.6 Article

Benchmarking of Gaussian boson sampling using two-point correlators

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.023836

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [665148]
  2. Networked Quantum Information Technologies (NQIT) hub (UK National Quantum Technologies Programme) [EP/N509711/1]
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [WA 3969/2-1]
  4. NWO Rubicon
  5. EPSRC [1796891, EP/M013243/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gaussian boson sampling is a promising scheme for demonstrating a quantum computational advantage using photonic states that are accessible in a laboratory and, thus, offer scalable sources of quantum light. In this contribution, we study two-point photon-number correlation functions to gain insight into the interference of Gaussian states in optical networks. We investigate the characteristic features of statistical signatures which enable us to distinguish classical from quantum interference. In contrast to the typical implementation of boson sampling, we find additional contributions to the correlators under study which stem from the phase dependence of Gaussian states and which are not observable when Fock states interfere. Using the first three moments, we formulate the tools required to experimentally observe signatures of quantum interference of Gaussian states using two outputs only. By considering the current architectural limitations in realistic experiments, we further show that a statistically significant discrimination between quantum and classical interference is possible even in the presence of loss, noise, and a finite photon-number resolution. Therefore, we formulate and apply a theoretical framework to benchmark the quantum features of Gaussian boson sampling under realistic conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available